Fibre count towards calories
First: I wasn't sure which category to choose for this comment/question.
I know I'm not the first to talk about this, but many of my logged foods count fibre as 4kcal/g.
This is even happening now with the soluble/insoluble showing up.
Using a LLM to get some insight, it reported that Cronometer only mirrors the information from databases, and doesn't adjust any values. If that's the case, has their been any effort on Cronometer's part to consider changing that policy, or perhaps petitioning the NCCDB or USDA to adjust values for fibre to be more accurate?
In a diet with 45-60+g of fibre, these miscalculations can result in being off by a fair bit. If the goal is to offer precise information, it seems that this is one of the remaining gaps to improve.